Carbon 14 dating of shroud of turin online dating sites in asia 2016 ee
Rogers, a chemist from the Los Alamos National Laboratory, University of California.
The abstract of the paper reads: Preliminary estimates of the kinetics constants for the loss of vanillin from lignin indicate a much older age for the cloth than the radiocarbon analyses.
Eventually, after diligent inquiry and examination, he [Henri de Poitiers] discovered how the said cloth had been cunningly painted, the truth being attested by the artist, who painted it, to wit, that it was a work of human skill and not miraculously wrought …
it would be quite unlikely the Holy Evangelists would have omitted to record an imprint on Christ’s burial linens or that the fact should have remained hidden until the present time.
Rogers had previously accepted the 1988 carbon dating but had revised his views.The radiocarbon date was thus not valid for determining the true age of the shroud.